Church
and Mission in Global Contexts: A Personal Reflection
Tao-jen
Wang
Global Christianity is changing: an
emerging “south” Christianity that Jenkins described in his book[1]
is transforming the look of global Christianity. The “south” is more conservative,[2]
indigenous,[3]
and sometimes Pentecostal.[4]
In contrast, religiosity is declining in
Western society and even in the United States.[5] So what’s wrong with western Christianity? Is the culture of western Christianity too
liberal and going down the wrong path? Or
is charismatic experience the key and we should all pursue it? Or from a non-Christian point of view, do
people become more “civilized” and “rational” and then abandon their
religion?
If we look deeper, people tired of churches
in the United States are still seeking spirituality.[6]
Human, being created by God, certainly has spiritual needs; it’s the church
that disappoints. And a conservative
theology does not guarantee from disappointment or decline; evangelical
churches in the United States are also going down.[7] Pentecostalism may or may not help, but there
seems to be difficulties for some people to experience God in this way than
others even if they are willing: spiritual gifts are given by the Spirit “who allots
to each one individually just as the Spirit chooses.” (1 Cor. 12:11 NRSV)
And when we are analyzing global
Christianity, we should keep in mind another important question: is “size” or “number
of Christians” the only right way to analyze a church? Is the largest church in the world always
doing the right thing? If so, the
Protestant Reformation should never take place and Jesus’s church should be
seen as a failure. Actually nearly every
church with its theology has its ups and downs.
Only God and His Word have the final say on what is right or wrong for a
church.
Even though a declining church does not
always mean something is wrong, it is still a good warning sign to see if we
miss God’s plan in some ways. At least
we can see what kind of church is drawing people in, which is important when we
want to do mission. So what do the “successful”
missions across the global landscape have in common? Why are people listening to what these churches
want to say?
Maybe it’s about post-modernization: across
east, west and south, the world we face now wants more experience than
doctrine, more feelings than knowledge, and more tolerance than truth. So when the church becomes more indigenous
and relevant to daily lives, and when charismatic experience really touches
people’s heart and solve their problems, people come to the church.
This is significant when we are facing a
new theological debate: homosexuality.
We already saw this issue divided the Anglicans and recently the
Presbyterian Church of U.S.A., which already resulted in churches leaving the
denomination, lawsuits of church properties and members leaving churches which
remained in the denomination. This seems
to be a difficult time for Christians who chose to stay and also for those who
left.
This controversy also has its impact in the
society in Taiwan, where the younger generation being more open and pushing the
older generation to change. For the time being, churches are mostly on
the side of the older generation, but this might change over time, since some
young Christians are changing their minds.
Is division inevitable in the future for churches in Taiwan? Will there be a time when Christians in Taiwan
need to pick sides? Is unity no longer
possible?
When one browses through the heated debate
among Christians, it is easy just to label some Christians being homophobia or
others forsaking the Holy Bible. But
this is actually not the truth, because if we know more of these Christians
personally, we will find that sincere God-fearing people with sincere love for
LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) exist on both sides. Christians in Taiwan are struggling and
trying to love God, love the church, and also love every person including
LGBT. A Christian may disagree on another
with regard to how to do these, but the heart for God and neighbors may be the
same.
This is important if we want to do mission
in this post-modern world: people are observing the church, including young
people. People might be tired of the debate
and the possible division; young people might perceive one side of the church
as outdated; but people might also feel the sincere heart of Christians on both
sides.
So for Christians in Taiwan or even for
Christians facing this issue around the world: we do not need to worry. We should always go to the word of God and
seek God’s guidance to differentiate right and wrong. No matter which theological stand we take, we
should face the debate with humility and love.
And hopefully, by God’s grace we can testify to the world the gospel we
experienced by the way we face this issue.
There might be difficult times ahead, but we know God will lead us
through everything.
[1] “South” may not mean geographically. See Philip Jenkins, The Next Christendom (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 3-4.
[2] Jenkins, The Next Christendom,
8.
[3] Jenkins, The Next Christendom,
58-59, 62. This is echoed by Lamin
Sanhneh, Whose Religion is Christianity (Grand
Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2003), 10-11, 31.
[4] Jenkins, The Next Christendom,
9.
[5] Diana B. Bass, Christianity
After Religion (New York: HarperCollins, 2013), 81
[6] Bass, Christianity After
Religion, 92.
[7] Bass, Christianity After
Religion, 12-13, 72.
沒有留言:
張貼留言